The Art Of Employee Relations

shaking-hands-image-drawing

We hear more and more about collective workforce disputes as businesses continue to look to restructure their operations in order to survive, compete, or grow, and these disputes have received something of a renaissance in recent years.

A quick glance at the national news outlines the various ballots and strikes continuing to take place at businesses right throughout the UK, such as Southern Rail, the Prison Service and Tata Steel. This industrial action is for a range of reasons too, including changes that could affect the health and safety of workers, employee’s working conditions or changes to pension arrangements.

An interesting development recently occurred at Southern Rail where employees who were members of the ASLEF union rejected a deal to resolve the ‘driver-only’ train dispute, a deal that ASLEF was recommending that their members accept, with this case being of particular interest due to the fact that Unions usually negotiate to the point of being confident that the deal they put forward to their members is more than likely going to be accepted.

HR have always played a key role in employment disputes and yet it does not seem to be mentioned as a core skill in the future direction often talked about by HR stakeholders. In the continued quest for HR to become strategic business partners, working proactively to develop organisations and the like, it is always important to remember that good employee/industrial relations and the management of such from a HR point of view, truly is, an art.

I was really fortunate to grow up in a true IR climate in the world of steelmaking. With colourful characters from a management and union side, I was given fantastic exposure as an up and coming HR professional to experience that world and understand how it works. I got to understand how important the mutual relationship was, and how issues could be addressed behind closed doors, out in the open, and even in those ‘tricky situations’ where the deal agreed behind closed doors was then played out in the open for full effect.

I often recall my first day in Steelmaking where I was introduced as a HR apprentice to a union representative who asked my boss if that meant I was a ‘Trainee Bastard’. I know it sounds bad, but I found it amusing, and I loved every minute in that environment.

But what I and my other ‘junior’ HR colleagues learned during this period, was a set of skills that nothing could have prepared us for, not the world of academia, not through our professional membership, and not in non-unionised environments. We learned the art of employee relations through watching how Employee Relations managers and Industrial Relations Directors operated. We watched them strategise, develop consultation plans, play a ‘chess game’ when considering what decisions they could and couldn’t make, watched them pick their battles and know when to deal. We also watched them love, almost every minute of it, unless the consultation was to discuss job losses, when conversations were more reserved and respectful. These skills were critical in the industries in which we operated.

My concern is that I gather this is now something of a dying skill, but if the recent news stories as I mentioned above are anything to go by, then these skills need to continue to be developed or businesses will suffer. Unions have continued to develop these core skills, largely as this continues to form a fundamental part of their job description, so if businesses fail to develop skills to represent their interests and their side of the debate, then employee relations disputes are in danger of no longer being a level playing field.

The rise of technology, automation, the fear of ‘robots are going to take our jobs’ and a difficult economic climate, means that businesses are going to need to consult and modify their working practices, terms and conditions, and even physical environments in the not-to-distant future which I predict will mean continued industrial action as it is inevitable that any proposed changes will not be to everyone’s satisfaction. And if the industrial action is going to continue, then the skills within the business environment to respond to this, will continue to be needed. So maybe developing HR professionals in the art of employee relations, needs a renaissance too.

Anti-Social Mobility

career-ladder

I find social class as a subject, difficult.

I can only talk about my own experience and situation, and so here’s my story.

I’m exceptionally proud of my working class roots and when the subject is raised I define myself categorically as working class although the truth is, by most definitions, I suppose these days, i’m middle class.

I grew up on a council estate in Neath called Meadow Road, a collection of a couple of hundred council houses and flats, identical looking, scattered in a circular fashion that had its own mini social structure depending on where in the street you lived.

I have fond memories of a strong feeling of community spirit, a happy childhood of using the full expanse of the council estate for the best games; football and British bulldog on the grass banks, fox and hounds around the lanes and gardens, and making dens in the neighbouring field and woods. And sure, the estate had its problems, but we would somehow turn those problems into interesting events.

I still vividly remember watching Chris Higgs, a lightning quick winger for Neath RFC who made his living as a police officer, easily outrunning a drug-addicted, recently released criminal, who within less than a week of being released from prison, was being recalled. I remember watching the chase and thinking it was incredibly exciting but on reflection, it was clearly very serious.

What I didn’t ever feel growing up, was restricted. I never felt that because of where I was living and where I was growing up, that this would affect my life choices or career options. I remember learning about social mobility in school and thinking that it was easily achievable. Certainly moving upwards in social class. Maybe I was naive, maybe I was being ignorant, maybe I was neither and maybe I was both. Now I see that its not been quite as easy for some as it is for others.

We moved out of the council estate when I was about 14 as my parents bought a house in a nearby street. Social mobility in action. At 16, just after leaving school and not knowing what to do with my life I took up a job as a claims handler in an insurance company. It had a referral scheme where I would get £250 if I recommended a friend to come and work there too and so I recommended one of my best friends. After the interview, where he was offered the job, he was clearly not himself. I asked him what was wrong and the interviewing manager had told him that in order to be successful within the company he would need to ‘drop his council estate accent’. Great GCSE’s, brilliant work ethic and yet he was defined in this interview by the way he talked. Disgraceful.

I left the insurance company not long after to take up an apprenticeship in Corus, formerly British Steel and now Tata, at the huge steelworks in Port Talbot. I was immediately thrown into a situation with people of all ages, all academic backgrounds and from all over the world and I distinctly remember feeling welcomed. I had landed this apprenticeship programme because I had good GCSE results and I passed the interview and aptitude test – nothing else mattered. Corus developed me and judged me only on performance, giving me opportunities because they saw potential in me. I owe that company a huge debt. 

Other than being cathartic, writing about my background serves a purpose for this blog post.

Today, on Twitter, one of my #PLN, general CIPD Legend and fellow member of the Bearded Welshmen Club (not an actual club), David D’Souza wrote;-

 

screen-shot-2017-01-30-at-22-13-46

The last line struck a chord.

An exchange ensued and David pointed me in the direction of an article on Huffington Post with the headline ‘Working Class People Earn £7,000 Less Than Privileged Colleagues, Research Shows’. You should read this article, the link is below. I responded to David by saying that whilst I agree with the article, I find it difficult to accept that it has led to such an impact on me personally. David helpfully encouraged me to be humble, but to follow the data. So i’m trying to do both.

The article itself explains amongst other things that ‘those from poorer backgrounds are less likely to ask for pay rises, have less access to networks and work opportunities or, in some cases, exclude themselves from promotion for fear of not fitting in’. It also explains that other reasons for the ‘class pay gap’ could include , conscious or unconscious discrimination or more subtle employment processes which lead to ‘cultural matching’ in the workplaces’. Even the terminology starts to make me feel uncomfortable.

Why do I find this a difficult subject? Because it has me torn.

This form of discrimination is obviously disgusting and elitism is clearly alive and kicking much to my dismay, and would I have wanted my social background to have been considered at any point in my career thus far, when assessing in particular, my remuneration and worth? Absolutely not. Has it affected me asking for remuneration in line with my value, or affected my ability to build a network? No. Although, its entirely plausible that some of these issues have occurred, without me realising it.

I’ve never, ever wanted people to treat me adversely or negatively in any way because of my working class upbringing and roots, but in the same line of thought, I too don’t ever want it to result in me being treated more favourably either. Like everyone else, I just want to be treated equally.

I don’t want my social background to be a factor at all when considering my level of success. I don’t want to be treated favourably because I have mobilised socially, and I certainly don’t want the ‘haven’t you done well’ type attitude towards me as a result of this either.

But maybe, i’m just one of the survey outliers and my story isn’t common – yet lots of people I grew up with in the same estate or nearby, grew up to be successful, who would also probably be considered ‘established middle class’ in the UK social class system, so maybe we aren’t outliers after all.

But here’s where i’m really torn.

I get that while my situation appears out of sync with how many others are being treated (possibly), hence the research in the article as well as the headline, I get that to address the issue, social background needs in some way to be considered. If only to safeguard against discrimination and close the gap. But how can this be achieved, sensitively, without upsetting people like me.

I have no idea.

So do we underestimate social background in terms of success? I’m sure Dave’s right and we do. But should we consider it at all – not necessarily. If I don’t want to be judged on my social background to be either negatively or positively treated, then why does it even need to be considered. Because working class people earn £7,000 less than priveleged colleagues, that’s why.

As I said, no answers – just my personal experience and opinion.

The song for this post – Merle Haggard – Working Man’s Blues

Huffington Post Article – http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/working-class-pay-social-mobility_uk_588928dae4b02af0a3d57008

Here’s a bit about Chris Higgs and other fantastic Welsh rugby players who were unlucky to never get a Senior squad welsh cap, in case you are interested – http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/definitive-list-unluckiest-welsh-rugby-9203471

Are we really open-minded?


To consider oneself open-minded is often seen as a badge of honour.
If someone takes a new idea and accepts the concept, it’s considered open-minded. If someone agrees and shows willing to debate their view, it’s considered open-minded. If someone treads into dialogue on a topic they do not understand, without agenda or expectation, it’s considered open-minded.
But thats really only half of what being open-minded is about.
I consider that generally I am an open-minded person, but not naive enough to believe myself to be a completely transparent individual. I have biases, I have views, I have beliefs and I have values just like everyone else, and occasionally, through personality traits all part of human nature, i’m open-minded until I won’t agree with someone else’s view, without justification, but simply due to my own inner code and for a reason I might not be able to explain.

“The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it”  Terry Pratchett.

I’m becoming increasingly concerned with the paradox in our society. Right wing versus left wing, right versus wrong, opinion versus fact. I’m concerned that we’re entering an age where being open-minded is becoming both a sword and a shield, albeit, through selective, often arrogant and ignorant application.

I’m often seeing cases of “you aren’t open-minded because you won’t engage with my narrow-minded view” type attitudes and not just from the more unsavoury sides of the debate. I also hear people ‘respecting other people’s views’ when they don’t, not really. They listen to it, understand it and move on without engaging – often dismissing the viewpoint without contemplating personally as to why they’ve chosen to do that.

Surely, to be truly open-minded, it’s about not just listening to the view of others, but by genuinely being prepared to be wrong, to change your opinion or flex your view if pursuaded to do so, without worrying about saving face, and protecting ego. It has to be about being mature enough to accept that this is normal, that its empowering, and that its human. Having an open-mind has to be about having one, not just telling others that you have one.

To be truly open-minded, in any context, both personally and professionally, we must encourage the eradication of fear of enlightenment, not just fear of disagreement. And it has to be about being open-minded most of the time, and not just when it suits.

Be Like HR

1246682

I read a lot about how HR should be more like other functions. It used to be Finance, currently its Marketing.

I get it, I do and there’s merit to it, but what I want is for HR to be more like… HR.

Yes we should “speak the language of the business” like our finance colleagues, and contextualise our contribution by having a solid grasp of the core nature of our organisations like our operational colleagues have, and of course, yes it’s clearly very useful to think like our marketing partners when promoting our activities to gain buy-in or to develop our employer brand.

HR should be like other departments, but other departments could learn a thing or two from us as well. Any department could be better and should look to be a Frankensteins monster version of themselves.

I want HR to be more like HR, only sometimes better.

I want HR to continue to care about the things no one else will think of or won’t think about with quite as much compassion and detail.

I want HR to continue to tirelessly promote the People agenda, by being mindful of employee wellbeing, personal development, and engagement. Real, authentic, meaningful engagement.

I want HR to continue to be the trusted critical friend of other employees at all levels throughout an organisation, to be the friendly shoulder and empathetic ear.

I want HR to continue to be more credible, leaving the fads behind and implementing tried and tested, evidence-based projects of work that add value to the organisation.

I want HR to continue to be the one department that remembers that the CEO/MD/GM is also an employee too.

Finally I want HR to be confident. Confident that we don’t need to put other departments on a pedestal as something we need to work towards but be confident that if we keep doing what we are doing, if we keep developing, evaluating, enhancing, learning and evolving, then we’ll become the benchmark.

Go and become that benchmark – go and be awesome.

My song for this post – Bon Iver with Holocene which includes my favourite lyric “At once, I knew, I was not magnificent…. I could see for miles, miles, miles”

 

Getting The Boot In Football Management – A Moral Dilemma

confused-face1

Firstly, happy new year! Like almost everyone else i’m glad to see the back of 2016 and I have higher hopes for the year ahead, although i’m not naive enough to believe this year will not be without its challenges as we continue to deal with the fall out from the events of the year gone by.

So during the Christmas break, amongst the usual things such as spending time with family, eating and drinking too much and catching up on some rest, I did what I love to do at this time of year; I watched the football.

Don’t stop reading just yet if you aren’t a football fan, this isn’t really about sport… much.

img_2006

If you follow me on Twitter it is probably impossible for you not to be aware that I am a huge Swansea City fan. I’m not a lifelong fan, I wasn’t really that interested until around 7 or 8 years ago, but I was offered a complimentary seat at a game once and was immediately hooked. I guess some would refer to me as a ‘plastic’ fan but that’s basically a lazy label that a shit-for-brains troll might throw in because they don’t have the basic intelligence to come up with something more creative. Anyway, I digress..

If you are aware of anything to do with football you will know that my team is not doing very well and that is in itself an understatement. We are bottom but one in the Premier League and have just replaced our manager. I’m optimistic, but this isn’t really about that.

Since October 3rd 2016 to December 27th 2016, a total of 85 days and 11 Premier League Games, my team was managed by a chap called Bob Bradley, an American, with no experience of the Premier League and a patchy overall managerial career who was given a poor side and no transfer window to show what he was about. However, in his 11 games, he showed enough to prove that he was out of his depth through implementing poor tactics, apparently losing the dressing room, and making strange team selections.

Egypt's head coach Bob Bradley of the U.S. Looks on during their 2014 World Cup qualifying second leg playoff soccer match against Ghana at Air Defence "30 June" stadium in Cairo

Many wanted Bob Bradley sacked from the get-go due to a view he shouldn’t have been appointed in the first place, but I strongly resisted. I felt this guy deserved a chance. After 7 or 8 games I too was losing my patience. Then came late December. Swansea had conceded 6 goals in the last 2 games and had lost 5 games in the last 8. We were playing West Ham on boxing day and before the game started I tweeted “come on Bradley, prove us all wrong”. We lost 4-1. I had reached the point, like many, many others, where I wanted Mr Bradley to be sacked.

The day after boxing day, Mr Bradley was ‘at work’ having taken training, he was away from his family who were most likely the other side of the world, and I wanted him to lose his job. I hoped he would resign, but either way, I did not want him managing Swansea City anymore.

I’ve probably lost most of my HR readers by this point but if your still reading, i’m getting to the point.

This had me thinking, and thinking, and then thinking some more.

My view on employees having their employment terminated, is that it is almost always a tragic situation. Termination is a failure and for the purposes of this blog post, it doesn’t matter whose failure it is. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a necessary evil and it will always happen, indeed it comes with the territory in my job and there will always be a need to terminate someone’s employment usually either due to conduct or performance, but just because it has to happen, doesn’t mean i’m comfortable about it. It is not like me to want someone to be dismissed but i’ve understood it when it’s happened to employees in places i’ve worked or when i’ve had to take the decision to terminate someone’s employment myself.

So if my view on termination is as i’ve described above, why did I so passionately believe Mr Bradley should have been given the boot? Why did/do I think its unacceptable in normal employment circumstances to feel one way, but in a sporting/hobby context to feel differently.

I’ve continued to mull this over, and i’ve tried to justify it to myself with the usual “It’s fine, he will have a massive payout” and “it’s part and parcel of the industry” with both statements more than likely being true, but it doesn’t change the fact that someone was brought into a room, told he had failed, and informed he was losing his job, at Christmas time.

I’ve concluded, harsh or not, i’m kind of ok with it for the most part because the contractual process in professional sport is a world I don’t understand, and because it happens so frequently. 27 managers in the four professional leagues have been dismissed so far this season. So due to this being the way in which professional sport has become it is provided for in the contracts in place, hence the ‘massive pay-outs’ that are so widely publicised. I can take some comfort in that although it might be an ‘ignorance is bliss’ strategy on my part.

“Brian Clough didn’t worry again about finance after being paid off by Leeds; he used to say to me it was the best thing that ever happened to him” Neil Warnock interview in The Independent, worth a read by clicking here.

I’ve concluded i’m probably ok with whats happened because many dismissed managers find alternative work fairly swiftly and that contract terminations in football are not usually seen as career-ending incidents but are accepted as very, very normal.

And i’ve concluded i’m probably ok with it because I know it was the right thing to do and the right time to do it. It just wasn’t nice.

And despite all that, i’m still uncomfortable with why i’m comfortable about it, if that makes sense.

I have no answers, just something to ponder on.

As a new years resolution, i’ve decided that in each blog post i’m going to embed a song I like that is probably, somehow relevant to the topic. So here’s Led Zeppelin with Dazed and Confused. An absolute classic.

Brexit – A South Wales HR Forum Event

img_1884

Last Thursday evening, the South Wales HR Forum hosted a fascinating discussion on Brexit and how it might impact the workplace in Wales. Our guest speaker was Paul Matthews, Chief Executive of Monmouthshire County Council. I know my readers like following authentic social leaders so you can follow Paul on Twitter by clicking here.

The South Wales HR Forum is a new network of HR professionals in South Wales with the aim of being a voice for the HR community across the region and with an objective of raising the profile of the workplace people agenda in the country.

Prior to this discussion we hosted our first ever event which was in April of this year where we talked about the future of HR, however this Brexit event was the first that had been arranged following the appointment of our Board members and so it felt a lot more special. You can read more on our board by clicking here.

We felt it was important to host an event on Brexit not just because it’s obviously topical, but because members of the HR community have reported some significant concerns since the referendum in June.

I opened the proceedings by explaining that individual attendees personal politics did not matter, and that this discussion was focussing on how the UK leaving the EU could potentially impact the workplace in Wales. I explained that whilst it appears no one can really say with any confidence whether we were heading for catastrophe or about to embark upon a brave new world, we were going to discuss what has happened so far, and speculate on what the future might hold.

To start things off, Victoria Hall, SWHRF board member and Head of Employment at NewLaw Solicitors gave an employment legal update discussing Brexit, modern slavery, gender pay gap and make up of holiday pay. However, this was an update with a difference. Victoria passionately discussed the impact of #modernslavery and encouraged attendees not just to comply with the law because it was the law, but because it was the right thing to do. At this event, we were supporting Cardiff Foodbank, and NewLaw solicitors have very kindly donated food in line with the number of Social Media interactions we had on the night.

Following Victoria was Paul Matthews. Paul opened by explaining that much of the discussion around Brexit has been largely inaccurate and noise. In a fascinating 40 or so minutes, Paul discussed how Monmouthshire Council employees responded to the referendum result and that first and foremost, people simply wanted and needed to talk about it. Paul explained how children in schools had lots of questions and so Paul had a team of people visiting the schools in his county, trying to help give some answers.

Paul explained how his approach since the result hasn’t altered, that the result is what it is and that this is a challenge that will need to be responded to, with Paul having nothing but confidence in his employees to be able to do that. Paul explained his love for the county of Monmouthshire and the people within the area which gave him great confidence.

An interesting point that has stuck with me since Paul’s talk is that he believes that how we tackle Brexit will be as much about our attitude towards it as anything else. I’m sure that’ll be controversial to some, but not for me. My personal view has always been, it’s not what I voted for, but it’s happening and so i’ll remain positive despite the odds.

When discussing leadership following the Brexit referendum Paul stated that “authenticity is everything” and that people wanted to see real leaders being honest and giving support as well as guidance. People needed confidence and a level-head from those giving direction.

In terms of HR, it was Paul’s view that the HR profession will have a key role in supporting the narrative that workplaces adopt regarding Brexit and encouraged attendees to start thinking about this if they aren’t already. Paul stated that HR are resilient and flexible and will again need to demonstrate these attributes as the workplace will need HR support with what might be coming next.

Following Paul’s discussion, I asked attendees in the room to talk to each other for a few minutes and identify 1 major positive that HR can create from Brexit. A fantastic dialogue took place between participants and when we asked attendees to feed back, lots of great points were raised. The below outlines some of the points mentioned. What was crystal clear, was nothing felt insurmountable.

img_1891

We closed the session with a Q&A for both Paul and Damien Burns (Senior Solicitor at NewLaw Solicitors). A mixture of questions were raised but what fascinated me was how the final point made included how an organisations values matter now more than ever.

It was a great event, I know that I really enjoyed it and learned so much from it.

Personally, I would like to thank Paul Matthews for inspiring and informing our forum, Damien Burns and Victoria Hall of NewLaw Solicitors for answering a range of legal questions raised and the rest of my fantastic Board members for all of their hard work.

More information on the South Wales HR Forum, including dates of future events when released, can be found on our website www.southwaleshrforum.co.uk. You can also follow us on Twitter @SWalesHRForum and you can also follow our individual Board Members;-

Myself – @MarkSWHRF

Victoria Hall – @VictoriaCJHall

Mark Stevenson – @DyfedS

Martyn Bull – @MartynCBull

Paul Harris – @PaulPennaWales

My Thoughts From #cipdACE16

unknown

Last week I attended CIPD’s Annual Conference and Exhibition (#cipdACE16) in Manchester, for 2 days of learning and sharing at the biggest event in the HR calendar.

I love this event, which has now become a regular date in my diary, as it gives me an opportunity to fully immerse myself in my profession and learn from like-minded people.

This year was going to be a little different for me as it’s been a busy year, i’ve changed roles, i’ve made lots of new friends in the HR world, including some on Twitter who I was fortunate enough to meet IRL (thats ‘In Real Life’ if you’re not down with the lingo) at this years conference.

So firstly, for those I did get chance to say hello to and talk to, although in most cases very briefly, it was great to meet you and I look forward to our paths crossing again. For those I didn’t although we were in the same place at the same time, I hope i’m forgiven as this was a very busy jam-packed event.

So I attended lots of sessions and I can’t talk about all of them here, so i’ll mention the highlights.

It’s worth mentioning, before the conference kicked off, I attended the People management drinks reception the evening before. I stayed for around an hour (the socially awkward guy in me can last around that long!) but was lucky enough to make some new contacts and speak with the folk behind People Management magazine. The hospitality was excellent and I was made to feel very welcome. So thanks guys for the invite!

First up on day one of the conference, as is customary, was Peter Cheese, the Chief Executive of the CIPD, opening the event and talking about the need for HR to step-up in this time of difficulty. I saw one of my connections on Twitter call this a ‘rallying cry’ and this is exactly what it felt like. Peter inspired the room and those in attendance by explaining that the time for HR to step-up and be counted was now and our bravery and passion was never needed so much. I felt really proud and enthused by this call.

Peter shared a slide with the room (I believe it was a Haikudeck by the way, of which I am also a fan…) that disclosed CIPD’s principles for the future. This slide outlined the principles as;-

Work Matters, People Matter, Professionalism Matters

These 6 words sum up perfectly what I believe in and want from HR. This is a great step from the CIPD which I am really encouraged by. Also, there is a talented, marketing genius somewhere that came up with that, so hats off to you!

Following Peter’s opening was the keynote speaker, Margaret Heffernan, who, amongst other things, is the author of the book ‘Willful Blindness’. I enjoyed Margaret’s session and learned more around the growth mindset . Margaret made two comments that stuck with me, which were “Expertise is a starting point, not an end point” and “expertise is not fixed. Talent is not fixed”. These remarks about what talent mix and skills mix are required for a successful organisation was an interesting and enlightening take, that challenges the old myth that organisations need the most talented individuals or the biggest groups of experts available, in order to be successful.

Later on day one, I managed to sneak into a session that was fully booked, which was that of Neil Morrison and Clare Thomas of Penguin Random House talking about the candidate experience. Putting it like that does this session an injustice. This workshop, facilitated by Sukh Pabial, made up a mere 45 minutes of my day as I had to leave early to get to another session, however this 45 minutes left the biggest impression for 2 reasons. Firstly, I was encouraged to think about treating candidates like customers. Just that simple suggestion I cannot stop thinking about and have already started to put into practice.

Secondly, a person on my table who I don’t know and is a HR professional turned to the table and said “I know we work in HR and we’re supposed to love people, but I hate people”. I’ve no idea why they came to say this in order to contextualise it, and I had no time to challenge the remark but I thought it was worth including in this post. I guess i recognised when reflecting on this, that not everyone will be aligned to CIPD’s new principles.

Next on to day two where I was booked to spend the morning attending the Evidence-Based HR workshop with David D’Souza of the CIPD and Rob Briner from the Centre for Evidence Based Management. I’ve talked a lot on EBHR so I’ll restrict this post purely on what I learned from this session. Despite broken air-con feeling like the first half of the workshop was set in an igloo, this session was full of great discussion, honest debate and fantastic humour. The igloo-effect in no way detracted from the enthusiasm and interest from the delegates in the room.

In this session I learned that EBM/EBHR is not just about scientific evidence, that it has its sceptics but that it has reinforced my belief that its important for the future credibility of HR. What worries me generally is some being reserved towards EBM in the view that it might be a ‘fad’. This eludes me and is for a future blog post i’m sure. On the flip side however, I was encouraged by the openness in the room and the desire and acknowledgement that EBHR is simply a tool for better, more-informed decision-making. If its ‘faddy’ to be discerning and to want our tools to be grounded in substantial, effective evidence, then where do I sign?

On to the next session and the final session I want to comment on, a panel discussion on how HR can improve operational performance. I must admit, this was something of a pleasant surprise for me. A  moment of honesty; there was nothing on the agenda at this time that really interested me and so I reluctantly picked this session. I’m very pleased that I did. Whilst I cannot recall the names of the panel members I do remember that two of the three panel members worked together at a senior level in a charity. One panelist was Head of HR and one panelist was an FD. Neither seemed particularly polished public-speakers and both were imparting wisdom to the attendees in a roundabout fashion. But what was so great about these two speakers was the dynamic. The proactive, professional approach they took and supportive relationship they had formed demonstrated the importance of cohesive teamwork between these crucial business functions which is often incorrectly stereotyped as a repellant relationship of ‘People Versus Numbers’ that some feel the HR/Finance relationship is branded as.

So those were my #cipdACE16 highlights and key learning points.

Oh there’s two more, practical tools for conference goers too, both of which involve the cloakroom! If you use the cloakroom they give you a ticket. Take a photo of the ticket. Trust me, I lost 2 of 3 tickets! My second tip, the cloakroom queue is huge at the end of the day – collect your coat before and not after your last session and save yourself 30 minutes at the end of the conference!

Until next year…